Home Music Events Forums Articles Music Blog Resources   Help
About MacJams.com opens a new door of opportunity for musicians around the world, providing a means of connecting, collaborating, and fostering the development of new music in a supportive environment.
  1. Sign Up [free]
  2. Listen
  3. Locate Musicians
  4. Start a Project
  5. Submit a Song
  6. Participate
Login
Username:
Password:
Who's Online Invisible Members: 0
Guests: 15

Subject: Opinion: DP vs. Logic

Pages: 1 [2]
eorthman
eorthman
July 12, 2007 1:28:48 PM
Quote by: Brian Weiland
I suspect most people here go looking for more "pro" features for their songs once they're ready to do creative mixing, and play with plugins and, for some of you, tackle the final mastering. I don't really want to master myself, because I don't think my gear or my ears are good enough. I'm doing some recording right now I'd like to eventually release, but I'm going to be sending my tracks to a mastering studio and let the pros with the gazillion dollar EQs and reverbs play with it.

But there are times when I need to print the music I've composed, either to give to other musicians or because I'm publishing a song. If Apple added the ability to print sheet music to GarageBand, I'd probably use nothing else! I guess that's why I was so disappointed with Logic- I thought it would be like GarageBand, only it would also allow me to print sheet music, preferably in a "Mac-like" way such as by having a big ol' "print" button to click, and having it immediately ask me which parts and how many copies, and then happily churn out engraved sheet music!

I think Logic DOES actually do this, I just couldn't figure out how. Probably those of you who know how are rolling your eyes :roll: but that's where I gave up. I actually found it easier to handwrite the parts than try to figure out that program! Maybe I should go back and play with it some more, now that I've heard so many people say that they like it, but unless the new one has a seriously redigned interface, I still think it's a valid point that it does not function in an intuitive way like everything else Apple puts their name on. Like I said, though, I'll give it another chance next time I'm at my school (vacation started this week! Woo hoo!- :mrgreen:
Oh wait, that just means I go to my other job- nevermind! :?

~Brian
kundaluni
kundaluni
August 07, 2007 11:43:03 PM
Hi There,

I've been a member of Sonikmatter (which is pretty much Logic specific) for quite a few years, just joining MacJams tonight. I came across this site as a result of a Google search of the comparison between DP and Logic Pro.

I think you all make some great points, with there being (IMO) no clear winner. FYI, I used to have (but, not really use) DP many years ago. In fact, I had it when it was just Performer. Though, at the same time, I had a Linn 9000 (you remember those?! :-), and later evolved to the Akai Linn MPC-60.

I did quite a bit of work on those dedicated machines, with good product, and as a result resisted software based sequencing for a long time. It was only a little over 3 years ago that I made the transition to Logic Pro. And, BELIEVE ME, the learning curve was steep!

To this day, I still have the latest version of DP, though I use exclusively Logic. The reason having little to do with which I think is the superior platform, but rather the fact that I've invested so many hours into Logic, I have no brain cells available for (or receptive to) learning another program. For my needs (which indeed are professional, concentrating more on record production, and the occasional jingle, rather than film, the latter of which I gather is better served by DP), Logic is just fine. In fact, I now feel comfortable enough to occasionally tutor someone else. ;-D

In my opionion, there is NO superior application. ProTools is great for audio, with Logic, DP, CueBase, Nuendo, etc., etc., all fulfilling niches that certainly overlap. They ALL get the job done, in different ways. Interestingly enough, I now find "basic recording" fairly straight ahead with Logic. If one decides to delve into the legendary Environment, as well as some other less than intuitive aspects of Logic, then it can become a beast. However, I seldom (unless absolutely necessary) look under the hood. And, have been just fine with not doing so.

As for notation, certainly it can be done in Logic (a good friend of mine, and a highly respected musician, kicks major butt in the Score Editor).But there are dedicated programs like Sibelius, Finale, etc., etc., that specialize in that area. Where I think Logic excels is in its integration of soft synths. It literally IS a studio within a box, this without 3rd. party plugins. I have a great friend in Nashville who is a DP whiz, and he has not been happy with the attempt by MOTU to integrate synths into version 5 (and, as a result reverted to 4.6).

Considering this is my first post, let me bring it to an end, before you guys give me the boot. :-) Hopefully I've been able to add something to the equation.

Take care,
Leon
rover101
rover101
August 13, 2007 11:08:14 PM
Some people are probably tired of me saying this, but if you want a logical upgrade path from GB, look at Mackie's Traction. It has a very similar interface, but without the hidden bits that make GB such a pain. A vastly superior mix engine and some very good plug-ins. Only downers; it's VST and not AU, and it doesn't import GB files directly.

Cheers, Shaky
Pages: 1 [2]


Post ReplyPlease login to post on this topic
Artist Profile
Leon photo
Leon

Events
Discussions
confused and kinda pissed off (7)
This place Rocks because! ! (32)
Unbelievable (10)
MJ Burnout? (36)
Guit/splint video (49)
guitapick videos (18)
Logic Thing (6)
Lavalamp - SanFrancisco 4 Christmas (4)
4Track -iPhone App (4)
Neil ! (6)

More Topics
Token Picks

More Picks